Critique of Intermediate Video Project

for Growth Plan

Video Technology

Name of Producer: ________________    Date: __________

Title of Project: __________________    Team Members:___________________________________________________

 

Criteria Scale
  1. Below Expectations
  2. Meets Expectations
  3. Above Expectations
Creative Title  
Titles are effective for intended audience  
Titles in Flash  
Titles follow the visual rule of 60% to 40%  
Titles  color scheme is media-pleasing  
Titles transitions enhance the project  
Titles content (spelling, spacing, readability, timing) well presented  
Music enhances project  
Digital Graphics enhance the project  
Audio is well mixed and edited  
Audio Transitions are smooth  
Video Transitions are smooth  
Creativity  
Camera Work enhances project  
Appropriate (multiple) camera angles  
Interview Skills / Commentary / Voiceover  
Interview / commentator provides forum to enhanced information  
Lighting enhances project  
Chroma Key work or Special Effects are appropriately implemented  
Length of project  
Editing takes advantage of the content  
Editing is well thought out  
Purpose of Video is clear  
Content covers the proposition  
Content is delivered in a creative and interesting manner  
Content appropriate to the intended audience  
Comments (may be assigned extra points by facilitator)  
Total Score  

 54-45 = A        36-44=B        18-35=C        Grade: _________

Evaluator's Name: ___________________________