PROGRAM NAME
Population: All students
Materials
¨ Any school material must:
o be inventoried each year
o be returned to appropriate resource site
o never to be thrown away
o be used, if not being used return to appropriate resource site
o be returned to appropriate resource site if leaving district
o be reported stolen immediately to appropriate administration
¨ Text Books/Work Books -----Need Publisher and workbooks, supplements by publisher
¨ Student Supply List-----Need
¨ Centers using Multiple Intelligence
¨ Videos- http://www.unitedstreaming.com/
¨ NCTM- National Mathematics Standards- http://standards.nctm.org/document/appendix/numb.htm
¨ Geometer’s Sketchpad
¨ TI-Navigator, Presenter
*TEA
www.accesstmds.com
v http://mathres.kevius.com/problem.html
DESCRIPTION
These courses are
designed to help students understand the application of mathematics in a real
world setting. These courses encourage
students to develop strategies for successful problem solving while learning to
use the fundamental algebraic skills required in further mathematics. Each course expands and builds on the use of
the fundamental skills learned in previous mathematics courses to develop
advanced algebraic concepts and real-world applications. Students develop the ability to recognize,
manipulate and strategize within an axiomatic system using inductive and
deductive reasoning. Students are
required to solve geometric real-world problems using an algebraic approach. Most
courses are designed to prepare college bound students by preparing them to
take Pre-Calculus and Calculus. We have
an alternative course called Math Models that is for students interested in
Business or the work force.
Working THEORY
¨ Dorothy Strickland “Whole Part Whole” http://www.arp.sprnet.org/curric/Dept_Chairs/whole/htm
¨
Curriculum-based
¨ Brain based Theory
o Concrete-Manipulatives
o Oral/Written Description- Detailing student’s mental picture
o Construction of pictorial
o Abstract
¨ Whole-Part-Whole (Dorothy Strickland) http://www.arp.sprnet.org/curric/Dept_Chairs/whole.htm
v Constructivist Classroom
v Content-Based Reading
v Multiple Intelligences
v Brained-based Research--Concrete to Abstract
ü Concrete-Manipulatives
ü Oral/Written Description- Detailing student’s mental picture (mental model)
ü Construction of pictorial
ü Abstract
v Theories
We've broken down this section on theories into the following five categories:
WORKING MODELS
¨ Dorothy Strickland “Whole Part Whole” http://www.arp.sprnet.org/curric/Dept_Chairs/whole/htm
¨ Dana Center Grades 9-12 http://www.tenet.edu/teks/math/teks/cabygradelev.html
Grades 5-8 http://www.tenet.edu/teks/math/teks/cabygradelev.html
¨ National Standards http://standards.nctm.org/document/index.htm
¨ Classroom Text Books and Supplemental Workbooks
WORKING POLICIES
¨ NCLB-TIERS http://www.arp.sprnet.org/default/district/inservice/inserv1.htm
¨ Character Counts- http://www.goodcharater.com and http://www.arp.sprnet.org/CC!.htm
¨ Reading Improvement Policy- http://www.arp.sprnet.org/curric/READ/Initiatives.htm
¨ Scans- http://www.arp.sprnet.org/default/LivingSkills/SixSkills.htm
¨
Pedagogical Resources
Teaching Math & Science: http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/sfaatoc.htm
Teaching Math & Science -->Concrete to Abstract: http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/Chap13.htm
TIME ALLOTMENTS
100% On Task
¨ 25% Explicit Instruction
¨ 15% Concrete Practice-Independent, Group & Guided
¨ Manipulatives: Jr. High: 3-4 times a week (calculator minimum 1 time per week)
*High School: 3-4 times a week
*Must include Calculator use
Calculator Use Means: (a). Teacher-to-Student Instruction
(b). Student use on homework
¨ 15% Oral Discussion-Group & Class
¨ 20% Abstract-Independent, Group & Guided
¨ 25% Guided Practice-Independent & Group
MENTORSHIP
|
Teacher to be mentored
|
Department |
|
Name of |
|
|
Course Code |
Course Name |
|
Staff Development /Module Number(s) |
Staff Development Title(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 3 – Staff Development
Improvement (To be completed at the conclusion of each six weeks)
Record details of mentoring
contacts with teacher (e.g. discussion of learning strategies, approval of
teacher generated assessment tools, assessment validation, parent contacts,
follow up at conclusion of assessment for improvement purposes. Attach additional information if required.
|
Date |
Details of Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|